Volume 19, Issue 4 (Winter 2019)
jrehab 2019, 19(4): 302-313 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abazarpour S, Mokhtarinia H R, Bakhshi E. Translation, Cultural Adaptation and the Reliability of the Persian Version of Quick Exposure Check Questionnaire. jrehab 2019; 19 (4) :302-313
URL: http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2362-en.html
URL: http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2362-en.html
1- Department of Ergonomics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran., tehran
2- Department of Ergonomics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ,hrmokhtarinia@yahoo.com
3- Department of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran., tehran
2- Department of Ergonomics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ,
3- Department of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran., tehran
Abstract: (5738 Views)
Objective Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) happen due to risk factors during work, across the world, especially in developing countries. Multiple risk factors (physical, psychosocial and mental) have contributed in MSDs as with most chronic diseases. Several tools are used to evaluate these risk factors. Quick Exposure Check (QEC) is one of the most accurate and quick-response tools for identifying these risk factors. The purpose of the present study is to translate cultural adaptation and to verify the reliability of the Persian-language rapid assessment evaluation checklist.
Materials & Methods This study is a methodological study. In this study, the intercultural equivalence of the QEC questionnaire was performed using the international quality of life assessment project. For doing face validity, the questionnaire was completed by 12 ergonomic experts and 15 employees. In this study, (ICC), (SEM), (α Cronbach) The checklist was reviewed on 80 construction workers. They were divided into two groups of 30 and 50. The questionnaire was completed at intervals of 3-7 days in two rounds.
Results The Persian version of QEC questionnaire was reported with easy terminology, wordage, and phrases. Interpreters were also unanimous about this, and the quality of translation was clearly translatable , the use of common language, conceptual equivalence, and the overall quality of translation was desirable. And the interpreter's agreement was satisfactory. In other words, the results of the formal validity check showed that all items were approved. High levels of internal consistency (α=0.74), inter-rater reliability (r=0.79-0.93) and intra-rater reliability (r=0.74-0.89) were obtained, too. Face validity had acceptable results from both workers and specialists’ perspective. In addition, SEM scale for inter-rater (4.9-0.4), intra-rater (2.8-0.73) showed low random errors.
Conclusion Questionnaire was verbally verified in a way that all 16 questions were clear, simple, and understandable with acceptable reliability. Therefore, The QEC can be applied as a specific risk assessment instrument for industrial and research studies in Persian language populations.
Materials & Methods This study is a methodological study. In this study, the intercultural equivalence of the QEC questionnaire was performed using the international quality of life assessment project. For doing face validity, the questionnaire was completed by 12 ergonomic experts and 15 employees. In this study, (ICC), (SEM), (α Cronbach) The checklist was reviewed on 80 construction workers. They were divided into two groups of 30 and 50. The questionnaire was completed at intervals of 3-7 days in two rounds.
Results The Persian version of QEC questionnaire was reported with easy terminology, wordage, and phrases. Interpreters were also unanimous about this, and the quality of translation was clearly translatable , the use of common language, conceptual equivalence, and the overall quality of translation was desirable. And the interpreter's agreement was satisfactory. In other words, the results of the formal validity check showed that all items were approved. High levels of internal consistency (α=0.74), inter-rater reliability (r=0.79-0.93) and intra-rater reliability (r=0.74-0.89) were obtained, too. Face validity had acceptable results from both workers and specialists’ perspective. In addition, SEM scale for inter-rater (4.9-0.4), intra-rater (2.8-0.73) showed low random errors.
Conclusion Questionnaire was verbally verified in a way that all 16 questions were clear, simple, and understandable with acceptable reliability. Therefore, The QEC can be applied as a specific risk assessment instrument for industrial and research studies in Persian language populations.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal Disorders, Face validity, Reliability, Quick Exposure Check Questionnaire, Persian version
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Rehabilitation
Received: 10/05/2018 | Accepted: 23/10/2018 | Published: 1/01/2019
Received: 10/05/2018 | Accepted: 23/10/2018 | Published: 1/01/2019
References
1. Ohlsson K, Attewell R, Skerfving S. Self-reported symptoms in the neck and upper limbs of female assembly workers: Impact of length of employment, work pace, and selection. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 1989; 15(1):75-80.[DOI:10.5271/sjweh.1879] [PMID] [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.1879]
2. Choobineh A, Tabatabaei SH, Tozihian M, Ghadami F. Musculoskeletal problems among workers of an Iranian communication company. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2007; 11(1):32-6. [DOI:10.4103/0019-5278.32462] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.4103/0019-5278.32462]
3. Polanyi MF, Cole DC, Beaton DE, Chung J, Wells R, Abdolell M, et al. Upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders among newspaper employees: Cross-sectional survey results. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1997; 32(6):620-8. [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199712)32:63.0.CO;2-T]
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199712)32:6<620::AID-AJIM8>3.0.CO;2-T [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199712)32:63.0.CO;2-T]
4. Denis D, St Vincent M, Imbeau D, Jette C, Nastasia I. Intervention practices in musculoskeletal disorder prevention: Acritical literature review. Applied Ergonomics. 2008; 39(1):1-14. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.02.002] [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.02.002]
5. Descatha A, Roquelaure Y, Chastang JF, Evanoff B, Cyr D, Leclerc A. Work, a prognosis factor for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2009; 66(5):351-2. [DOI:10.1136/oem.2008.042630] [DOI:10.1136/oem.2008.042630]
6. Waters TR, Dick RB, Krieg EF. Trends in work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A comparison of risk factors for symptoms using quality of work life data from the 2002 and 2006 general social survey. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2011; 53(9):1013-24. [DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181fc8493] [DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181fc8493]
7. Khandan M, Vosoughi S, Poursadeghiyan M, Azizi F, Ahounbar E, Koohpaei A. Ergonomic assessment of posture risk factors among Iranian Workers: An alternative to conventional methods. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2018; 16(1):11-6. [DOI:10.29252/nrip.irj.16.1.11] [DOI:10.29252/nrip.irj.16.1.11]
8. Parno A, Sayehmiri K, Azrah K, Ebrahimi MH, Poursadeghiyan M. [The prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the lower limbs among Iranian workers: A meta-analysis study (Persian)]. Iran Occupational Health. 2016; 13(5):49-59.
9. Boersma K, Linton SJ. Screening to identify patients at risk: Profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2005; 21(1):38-43. [DOI:10.1097/00002508-200501000-00005] [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/00002508-200501000-00005]
10. Sharafi N, Gharibi F, Khoubi J. [Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and its relation to working posture in Sanandaj hand-woven carpet weavers (Persian)]. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. 2014; 19(4):1-9.
11. Adot S AR. The impact of ergonomic intervention on individual health and corporate prosperity in a telecommunications environment. Ergonomics. 1994; 37(10):1679-96.[DOI:10.1080/00140139408964945] [DOI:10.1080/00140139408964945]
12. Cheng AS, So PC. Development of the Chinese version of the Quick Exposure Check (CQEC). Work. 2014; 48(4):503-10. [DOI: 10.3233/WOR-131804.] [PMID] [PMID]
13. David G, Woods V, Buckle P, Stubbs D. Further development of the Quick exposure Check (QEC). Paper presented at: The 15th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association 24 Aug 2003; Guildford: University of Surrey.
14. Choubineh A, Mokhtarzadeh A, Salehi M, Tabatabaei SHR. [Ergonomic evaluation of exposure to musculoskeletal disorders risk factors by QEC technique in a rubber factory (Persian)]. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal. 2008; 7(1):46-55.
15. Li G, Buckle P. Evaluating chang in exposure to risk for musculoskeletal disorders: A practical tool. Bootl: Health and Safety Executive; 1999.
16. David G, Woods V, Li G, Buckle P. The development of the Quick Exposure Check (QEC) for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Applied Ergonomics. 2008; 39(1):57-69. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.03.002] [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.03.002]
17. Comper ML, Costa LO, Padula RS. Clinimetric properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Quick Exposure Check (QEC). Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2012; 16(6):487-94. [DOI:10.1590/S1413-35552012005000049] [PMID] [DOI:10.1590/S1413-35552012005000049]
18. Sukadarin EH, Deros BM, Ghani JA, Ismail AR, Mokhtar MM, Mohamad D. Investigation of ergonomics risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders among oil palm workers using Quick Exposure Check (QEC). Advanced Engineering Forum. 2013; 10(2013):103-9. [DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.10.103] [DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.10.103]
19. Comper MLC, Costa LO, Padula RS. Quick Exposure Check (QEC): A crosscultural adaptation into Brazilian-Portuguese. Work. 2012; 41(Suppl.1):2056-9. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-2012-0430-2056] [PMID] [PMID]
20. Ozcan E, Kesiktas N, Alptekin K, Ozcan EE. The reliability of Turkish translation of Quick Exposure Check (QEC) for risk assessment of work related musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2008; 21(1):51-6.[DOI:10.3233/BMR-2008-21107] [DOI:10.3233/BMR-2008-21107]
21. Kahrazei F, Chadha NK. A cross-cultural study of the relationship of emotional self-regulation with phobia in Iranian and Indian students. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2018; 6(1):29-38. [DOI:10.29252/nirp.jpcp.6.1.29] [DOI:10.29252/nirp.jpcp.6.1.29]
22. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25(24):3186-91. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014] [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014]
23. Yar Kohammadi H, Sohrabi Y, Poursadeghiyan M, Rostami R, Tabar AR, Abdollahzadeh D, et al. Comparing the posture assessments based on RULA and QEC methods in a carpentry workshop. Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 10(3):80-3. [DOI: 10.3923/rjmsci.2016.80.83]
24. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplège A, Sullivan M, Wood Dauphinee S, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998; 51(11):913-23. [DOI:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00082-1] [DOI:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00082-1]
25. Abdollahipour F, Alizadeh Zarei M, Akbar Fahimi M, Karamali Esmaeili S. [Study of face and content validity of the Persian version of behavior rating inventory of executive function, preschool version (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2016; 17(1):12-9. [DOI:10.20286/jrehab-170110] [DOI:10.20286/jrehab-170110]
26. Vakilizadeh N, Abedi A, Mohseni Ezhiyeh A. [Investigating validity and reliability of Early Screening for Autistic Traits-Persian Version (ESAT-PV) in Toddlers (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2017; 18(3):182-93. [DOI:10.21859/jrehab-1803182]
27. Parsian N, Am T. Developing and validating a questionnaire to measure spirituality: A psychometric process. Global Journal of Health Science. 2009; 1(1):2-11. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v1n1p2] [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v1n1p2]
28. Khalifeh Loo S, Mobaraki H, Kamali M, Jafari Z. [Research paper: Designing and determining validity and reliability of the questionnaire for parents satisfaction with the services provided for children with hearing loss (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2016; 17(3):244-51. [DOI:10.21859/jrehab-1703244] [DOI:10.21859/jrehab-1703244]
29. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin. 1979; 86(2):420-8. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420]
30. Musavinasab M, Ravanipour M, Pouladi S, Motamed N, Barekat M. [Examining the validity and reliability of the cardiovascular disease questionnaire in measuring the empowerment of elderly patients to receive social support (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2016; 11(2):258-269. [DOI:10.21859/sija-1102258] [DOI:10.21859/sija-1102258]
31. Maher CG, Grotle M. Evaluation of the predictive validity of the orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2009; 25(8):666-70. [DOI:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a08732] [DOI:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a08732]
32. Shafeei A, Mokhtarinia HR, Maleki Ghahfarokhi A, Piri L. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire. Asian Spine Journal. 2017; 11(4):520-30. [DOI:10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.520] [DOI:10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.520]
33. Hicks C. Research methods for clinical therapists. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
34. Shahvarughi Farahani A, A'zimian M, Fallah Pour M, Karimlou M. [Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Persian version of Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) among persons with Multiple Sclerosis (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2013; 13(4):84-91.
35. Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine. 1998; 26(4):217-38. [DOI:10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002] [PMID] [DOI:10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002]
36. Gliem JA, Gliem RR. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Paper presented at: 2003 Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. 8-10 October 2003; Columbus: The Ohio State University. [PMID] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright © The Author(s);
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
