Volume 19, Issue 1 (Spring 2018)                   Vol. , No. , Season & Year , Serial No. | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Matloubi S, Zarifian T, Shirazi T S, Bakhshi E. Review and Comparison of Content Growth in Word Definition of Persian Speaking Children of 7-12 Years of Age. jrehab. 2018; 19 (1) :4-7
URL: http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-1735-en.html
1- Department of Speech Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Speech Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , t.zarifian@yahoo.com
3- Department of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1262 Views)
Objective Language has three components: content, form and pragmatic. The content includes the semantic components. Semantic knowledge of word relationships requires awareness of the relationships between different words in the same field and other fields. One of the main components of the semantic is the mental lexicon that many of the semantic communications, including the organization and semantic representations of words, take shape in this network. The important issue is how to organize words in mind, linking the words together and their position in the semantic network. One task that helps to organize the meanings of the words in the mental lexicon is the word definition task. The ability to define words is reliant o  several aspects of linguistic and metalinguistic  development, literacy, and academic achievement. The aim of this investigation was to study the definitional style of nouns in typically developing school-aged children. 
Materials & Methods In this cross-sectional and descriptive-analytical study, 150 typically developing school-aged children, selected using multistage sampling method, studying in the second to sixth grades in 1, 7 and 17 municipal districts of Tehran were included. The definition skill was assessed with word definition task. The students were asked to define the words, and their answers were scored based on content. The reliability was assessed by two independent values, and the validity was determined by the content. The results were analyzed by the SPSS V. 22 software using the methods of independent- samples T test, univariate analysis of variance and Tukey’s test.
Results The findings showed that by increasing the age, the noun definitions were developed from functional and concrete responses into combination two and using of superordinate terms were increased. The mean score of the content in word definition was significantly increased by age (P<0.001). Also the performance of girl students was better as they earned higher scores than the boys (P=0.03). 
Conclusion  On increasing the age, the content quality of word definitions improved significantly. The concepts were found to be organized into hierarchies of connections. Also, definitions were developed from functional and concrete responses into combination two and formal responses. And finally, the word definition task can be used by speech and language therapists in clinical and educational environments.
Full-Text [PDF 6803 kb]   (517 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (695 Views)  
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Speech & Language Pathology
Received: 3/07/2017 | Accepted: 10/12/2017 | Published: 1/02/2018

References
1. Altenberg B, Granger S. Recent trends in cross-linguistic lexical studies. In: Altenberg B, Granger S, editors. Lexis in contrast: Corpus-based approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2002. doi: 10.1075/scl.7.04alt [DOI:10.1075/scl.7.04alt]
2. Ramezani S, Nilipour R, Yadegari F, Rahgozar M. [The effect of phonological encoding complexity on speech fluency of stuttering and non-stuttering children (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2012; 12(4):42-7.
3. Pahlavannezhad MR, Moulavi VA. The effect of frequency, semantic priming and repetition priming on lexical access. Journal of Human Sciences. 2008; 56:29-40.
4. Hoff E. Language development. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2013.
5. Paul R. Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment & intervention. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
6. Malrieu JP. Evaluative semantics: Cognition, language and ideology. Abingdon: Routledge; 2002.
7. Gaskell MG, Altmann G. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.001.0001]
8. Aitchison J. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
9. Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1997; 14(1):177–208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664 [DOI:10.1080/026432997381664]
10. Smith EE, Medin DL. Categories and concepts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1981. [DOI:10.4159/harvard.9780674866270]
11. McGhee-Bidlack B. The development of noun definitions: A metalinguistic analysis. Journal of Child Language. 1991; 18(2):417-34. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900011132 [DOI:10.1017/S0305000900011132]
12. Vannest J, Newport EL, Newman AJ, Bavelier D. Interplay between morphology and frequency in lexical access: The case of the base frequency effect. Brain Research. 2011; 1373:144–59. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.022 [DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.022]
13. Matloubi S, Zarifian T, Shirazi TS, Bakhshi E. [Word definitional skills in school age Persian speaking children: A developmental study on form (Persian)]. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2015; 13(3):103-8.
14. Mohammad M, Nilipour R, Shirazi TS, Rahgozar M. Examining expression of lexical categories in Farsi- speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Language Pathology. 2013; 1(1):8-19.
15. Marinellie SA, Johnson CJ. Nouns and verbs: A comparison of definitional style. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2004; 33(3):217–35. doi: 10.1023/b:jopr.0000027963.80639.88 [DOI:10.1023/B:JOPR.0000027963.80639.88]
16. Luria AR. Language and cognition [H. Ghasemzade Persian trans.]. Tehran: Arjmand Press; 2012.
17. Leontjev AN. Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: The publisher of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the RSFSR; 1959.
18. Al-Issa I. The development of word definition in children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 1969; 114(1):25–8. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1969.10533835 [DOI:10.1080/00221325.1969.10533835]
19. Skwarchuk SL, Anglin JM. Expression of superordinates in children's word definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1997; 89(2):298. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.298 [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.298]
20. Marinellie SA, Johnson CJ. Definitional skill in school-age children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders. 2002; 35(3):241–59. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9924(02)00056-4 [DOI:10.1016/S0021-9924(02)00056-4]
21. Benelli B, Belacchi C, Gini G, Lucangeli D. 'To define means to say what you know about things': The development of definitional skills as metalinguistic acquisition. Journal of Child Language. 2006; 33(1):71-97. doi: 10.1017/s0305000905007312 [DOI:10.1017/S0305000905007312]
22. Marinellie SA, Chan YL. The effect of word frequency on noun and verb definitions: A developmental study. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 2006; 49(5):1001. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/072) [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/072)]
23. Gavriilidou Z. The development of word definitions in Greek Preschoolers [Internet]. 2011 [Cited 2011 September 23]. Available from: http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/ICGL/proceedings/9_GAVRIILIDOU_KEDITED_88.pdf
24. Nippold MA. School-age children and adolescents. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools. 1995; 26(4):320. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461.2604.320 [DOI:10.1044/0161-1461.2604.320]
25. Mohammadi M, Nilipoor R, Shirazi TS, Rahgozar M. Semantic differences of definitional skills between Persian speaking children with specific language impairment and normal language developing children. Journal of Rehabilitation. 2011; 12(2):48-55.
26. Malekian M, Sima Shirazi T, Zarifian T, Reza Soltani P, Dastjerdi m. [Study of Development of word definition skill in children (Persian)]. Speech and Language Pathology. 2014; 6(1):51-60.
27. Litowitz B. Learning to make definitions. Journal of Child Language. 1977; 4(02):289–304. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900001665 [DOI:10.1017/S0305000900001665]
28. Johnson CJ, Anglin JM. Qualitative developments in the content and form of children's definitions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 1995; 38(3):612-29. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3803.612 [DOI:10.1044/jshr.3803.612]
29. Snow CE. The development of definitional skill. Journal of Child Language. 1990; 17(3):697. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900010953 [DOI:10.1017/S0305000900010953]
30. Belacchi C, Benelli B, Benelli B. Ambergris is not a precious fossil: the development of definitional skills. Developmental Psychology. 2005:5-10.
31. Chan YL, Marinellie SA. Definitions of idioms in preadolescents, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2007; 37(1):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9056-9 [DOI:10.1007/s10936-007-9056-9]
32. Nelson K. Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological Review. 1974; 81(4):267–85. doi: 10.1037/h0036592 [DOI:10.1037/h0036592]
33. Benelli B, Belacchi C, Gini G, Lucangeli D. "To define means to say what you know about things": The development of definitional skills as metalinguistic acquisition. Journal of Child Language. 2006; 33(01):71. doi: 10.1017/s0305000905007312 [DOI:10.1017/S0305000905007312]
34. Miller GA, Gildea PM. How children learn words. Scientific American. 1987; 257(3):94–9. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0987-94 [DOI:10.1038/scientificamerican0987-94]
35. Gutierrez-Cleflen VF, DeCurtis L. Word definition skills in spanish-speaking children with language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly. 1999; 21(1):23–31. doi: 10.1177/152574019902100104 [DOI:10.1177/152574019902100104]
36. Gareth Gaskell M. The oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. New York: Oxford University. 2007. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.001.0001] [PMCID]
37. Gaskell MG. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.001.0001 [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.001.0001]
38. Dabiran H, Isazade M. [Smile process in persian literature (with the focus of nine books in the field of expression and rhetoric) (Persian)]. Quarterly Journal of Stylistic of Persian Poem and Prose (Bahar-e-Adab). 2013; 6(3):153-66.
39. Nelson KA. Semantic development and the development of semantic memory. Children's Language. 1978; 1:39-80.
40. Gentner D. Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning, technical report No. 257. Cambridge: Center for the Study of Reading; 1982. [PMID]
41. Storck PA, Looft WR. Qualitative analysis of vocabulary responses from persons aged six to sixty-six plus. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1973; 65(2):192–7. doi: 10.1037/h0034907 [DOI:10.1037/h0034907]
42. Benelli B, Arcuri L, Marchesini G. Cognitive and linguistic factors in the development of word definitions. Journal of Child Language. 1988; 15(03):619. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900012599 [DOI:10.1017/S0305000900012599]
43. Nippold MA, Hegel SL, Sohlberg MM, Schwarz IE. Defining abstract entities. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 1999; 42(2):473-81. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4202.473 [DOI:10.1044/jslhr.4202.473]
44. Schuster JW, Stevens KB, Doak PK. Using constant time delay to teach word definitions. The Journal of Special Education. 1990; 24(3):306–18. doi: 10.1177/002246699002400305 [DOI:10.1177/002246699002400305]
45. Duncan GJ, Brooks Gunn J, Klebanov PK. Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Development. 1994; 65(2):296. doi: 10.2307/1131385 [DOI:10.2307/1131385]
46. Malekian M, Simashirazi T, Zarifian T, Rezasoltani P, Dastjerdi M. Development of word definition skill in children. Journal of Speech and Language Pathology. 2014; 1(3):51-60.
47. A'meri H, Golfam A, Kolk H, A'shayeri H, Hagh-Shenas A M, Kord-Za'feranlou E. [Inreraction of Syntactic Comprehension and Ability of Cognitive Sequence Processing in Persian Speeking Broca Aphasic Patients (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2008; 9(2):20-27.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Archives of Rehabilitation

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb