Volume 19, Issue 4 (Winter 2019)                   Vol. , No. , Season & Year , Serial No. | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jalili N, Nasr Z, Zare R, Sattari M, Hosseini A. Occupational Performance Priorities of Children With Cerebral Palsy From the Parents’ Perspective. jrehab. 2019; 19 (4) :370-379
URL: http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2367-en.html
1- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , satari_mahsa@yahoo.com
3- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (290 Views)
Objective Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of non-progressive disorders in a developing brain that results in motor problems and other limitations in daily living activities. The presence of motor functions in these children reduces their participation in daily activities. This is one of the important aspects of the child’s health and development, especially the child’s physical and psychological development. Participation in social activities promotes life satisfaction. Besides, family has a prominent role in identifying and supplying the child’s needs. In other words, family plays an essential role in ensuring the health and well-being of their children. Thus, provisions of growth-related health services has now changed from a child-cantered model into a family-cantered model. As a result, it is very important to understand the parents’ priorities about participation of their children in the daily activities and providing appropriate client-center services.
Materials & Methods In this descriptive-analytic study, 78 children and teenagers with CP aged 3-18 years without psychiatric problems and their parents from Yazd City, Iran had participated. The samples were selected by convenience sampling method, from clients of private and public rehabilitation centers in Yazd Province. In this regard, one state and two private centers were randomly selected and the study samples were selected from the clients referred to the centers. Parents' priorities for participation of their children in activities of daily living were found through semi-structured interviews. In these interviews, we used Canadian occupational performance measure to evaluate the child's level of occupational performance and parents’ satisfaction in the three areas of self-care, productiveness, leisure from the parents’ perspective. In addition, the level of gross motor performance was evaluated based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) at five levels. In the Iranian society, the validity of Canadian occupational performance measure for each of three areas of occupational performance has been reported to be between 9.75 and 3.75 and the reliability level for the three domains reported above 0.78. The statistical analysis of data was performed in SPSS V. 16. Descriptive statistics and odds ratio were used for analyzing the data.
Results the children’ Mean±SD age was 8.12±4.22 years. The first priority reported by the parents was self-care. Mobility was known as the second important priority in everyday life for children. The results obtained from the statistical analysis showed no significant relationship between age and different motor levels (P≥0.05).
Conclusion Parents reported functional priorities in similar performance aspects by all age groups and GMFCS levels in Cerebral Palsy children. The first priority was related to self-care. This reflects the desire of the parents to children’ doing self-care activities, which not only reduces care pressure, but also leads to promotion in social participation and independence in individual life. The next priority was mobility and the reason can be attributed to the fact that children with CP need mobility to manage their daily life activities.
Full-Text [PDF 4367 kb]   (165 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Occupational Therapy
Received: 10/06/2018 | Accepted: 25/11/2018 | Published: 1/01/2019

References
1. Case-Smith J, O'Brien JC. Occupational therapy for children. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
2. Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: The definition and classification of Cerebral Palsy April 2006. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology Supplement. 2007; 109(suppl.109):8-14. [PMID] [PMID]
3. Nobakht Z, Rassafiani M, Rezasoltani P. [Influence of child's disability on encountering environmental barriers to participation of children with Cerebral Palsy (Persian)]. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences and Research. 2013; 9(2):286-94.
4. Jalili N, Godarzi M, Rassafiani M, Haghgoo H, Dalvand H, Farzi M. [The influenced factors on quality of life of mothers of children with severe Cerebral Palsy: A survey study (Persian)]. Modern Rehabilitation. 2013; 7(3):40-7.
5. Rostam Zadeh O, Amini M, Hasani Mehraban A. [Research paper: Comparison of participation of children with Cerebral Palsy aged 4 to 6 in occupations with normal peers (Persian)]. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2016; 17(3):192-9. [DOI:10.21859/jrehab-1703192] [DOI:10.21859/jrehab-1703192]
6. Hassani Mehrabanm A, Hasani M, Amini M. The comparison of participation in school-aged Cerebral Palsy children and normal peers: A preliminary study. Iranian Journal of Paediatrics. 2016; 26(3):e5303. [DOI:10.5812/ijp.5303] [DOI:10.5812/ijp.5303]
7. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & Youth Version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
8. Michelsen SI, Flachs EM, Uldall P, Eriksen EL, McManus V, Parkes J, et al. Frequency of participation of 8-12-year-old children with Cerebral Palsy: A multi-centre cross-sectional European study. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 2009; 13(2):165-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejpn.2008.03.005] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.ejpn.2008.03.005]
9. Chiarello LA, Palisano RJ, Maggs JM, Orlin MN, Almasri N, Kang LJ, et al. Family priorities for activity and participation of children and youth with Cerebral Palsy. Physical Therapy. 2010; 90(9):1254-64. [DOI:10.2522/ptj.20090388] [PMID] [DOI:10.2522/ptj.20090388]
10. Committee on Children With Disabilities. Role of the pediatrician in family-centered early intervention services. Pediatrics. 2001; 107(5):1155-7. [DOI:10.1542/peds.107.5.1155] [DOI:10.1542/peds.107.5.1155]
11. Darrah J, Law M, Pollock N. Family-centered functional therapy-a choice for children with motor dysfunction. Infants & Young Children. 2001; 13(4):79-87. [DOI:10.1097/00001163-200113040-00014] [DOI:10.1097/00001163-200113040-00014]
12. Lammi BM, Law M. The effects of family-centred functional therapy on the occupational performance of children with Cerebral Palsy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2003; 70(5):285-97. [DOI:10.1177/000841740307000505] [PMID] [DOI:10.1177/000841740307000505]
13. Mohamadi F, Sourtiji H, Hosseini MS. [A new approach in rehabilitation of children with Cerebral Palsy (Persian)]. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2012; 7(5):758-65.
14. Eyssen I, Beelen A, Dedding C, Cardol M, Dekker J. The reproducibility of the Canadian occupational performance [DOI:10.1191/0269215505cr883oa] [PMID] [DOI:10.1191/0269215505cr883oa]
15. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: A research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2004; 71(4):210-22. [DOI:10.1177/000841740407100406] [PMID] [DOI:10.1177/000841740407100406]
16. Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, Rosenbaum P, Russell D, Walter SD, et al. Focus on Function-a randomized controlled trial comparing two rehabilitation interventions for young children with Cerebral Palsy. BMC Pediatrics. 2007; 7:31. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-7-31] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-7-31]
17. Dehghan L, Abdolvahab M, Bagheri H, Dalvand H, Faghih Zade S. [Inter rater reliability of Persian version of gross motor function classification system expanded and revised in patients with Cerebral Palsy (Persian)]. Daneshvar Medicine. 2010; 18(91):37-44.
18. Riahi A, Rassafiani M, Binesh M. [The cross-cultural validation and test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the Persian translation of parent version of the gross motor function classification system for children with Cerebral Palsy (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2013; 13(5):25-30.
19. Law M, Stewart D. Test retest reliability of the COPM with children. Ontario: Occupational Therapy University School of Rehabilitation; 1996.
20. Atashi N, Aboutalebi S, Heidari M, Hosseini SA. Reliability of the Persian version of Canadian occupational performance measure for Iranian elderly population. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2010; 8(12):26-30.
21. Rassafiani M, Sahaf R. Hypertonicity in children with Cerebral Palsy: A new perspective. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2011; 9:66-74.
22. Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Rassafiani M, Akbar Fahimi N, Nobakht Z. Cerebral Palsy: Motor types, gross motor function and associated disorders. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2011; 9:21-31.
23. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 1998.
24. Brandão MB, Oliveira RH, Mancini MC. Functional priorities reported by parents of children with Cerebral Palsy: Contribution to the pediatric rehabilitation process. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2014; 18(6):563-71. [DOI:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0064] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0064]
25. Gimeno H, Gordon A, Tustin K, Lin JP. Functional priorities in daily life for children and young people with dystonic movement disorders and their families. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 2013; 17(2):161-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.07.007] [PMID]
26. Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 1943; 50(4):370-96. [DOI:10.1037/h0054346] [DOI:10.1037/h0054346]
27. ØstensjØ S, Øien I, Fallang B. Goal-oriented rehabilitation of preschoolers with Cerebral Palsy-a multi-case study of combined use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 2008; 11(4):252-9. [DOI:10.1080/17518420802525500] [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/17518420802525500]
28. Pollock N, Stewart D. Occupational performance needs of school-aged children with physical disabilities in the community. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics. 1998; 18(1):55-68. [DOI:10.1080/J006v18n01_04] [DOI:10.1080/J006v18n01_04]
29. Verkerk GJ, Wolf MJM, Louwers AM, Meester Delver A, Nollet F. The reproducibility and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in parents of children with disabilities. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2006; 20(11):980-8. [DOI:10.1177/0269215506070703] [PMID] [DOI:10.1177/0269215506070703]
30. Gharebaghy S, Mirbagheri S, Khazaeli Kh. Occupational performance in children aged 6 to 13 Years with Cancer. Function and Disability Journal. 2018; 1(1):44-50 [DOI:10.30699/fdisj.01.1.49]
31. Palisano RJ, Shimmell LJ, Stewart D, Lawless JJ, Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ. Mobility experiences of adolescents with Cerebral Palsy. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics. 2009; 29(2):133-53. [DOI:10.1080/01942630902784746] [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/01942630902784746]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Archives of Rehabilitation

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb