Volume 18, Issue 4 (Winter 2018)                   jrehab 2018, 18(4): 328-337 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.21859/jrehab.18.4.7

XML Persian Abstract Print

The Effects of Two Months Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training on Balance and Quality of Life of Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Hamid Zamani1 , Mahdi Dadgoo1 , Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani1 , Elie Hajouj1 , َAli Ashraf Jamshidi Khorneh 2
1- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , jamshidi.a@iums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (6499 Views)

Objective Spinal cord injury is a major problem for all communities that affect personal and social aspects of the patient’s life. The most common issues that spinal cord injury patients face are paralysis, muscle atrophy, pain, and spasticity. The ability to walk also may be disrupted or lost in many of the patients with spinal cord injury. Most common approaches to rehabilitation for patients with spinal cord injury are the emphasis on healthy neuromuscular sections to promote these sectors and compensate existing defects. But recent studies have reported that the neuromuscular system is capable of plasticity and after spinal cord injury is necessary to pay attention to health and impaired neuromuscular parts of the body. Gait training is one of the rehabilitation approaches that is trying to recruit impaired neuromuscular parts and improve them. This rehabilitation is performed in different ways. In this study, the effect of body weight supported treadmill training on balance and quality of life in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury was evaluated.
Materials & Methods This is a quasi-experimental study. Patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (n=15) aged 26 and 48 years with a chronic (>1 year post-injury), grade D=4 and C=11 (according to American spinal cord injury association scale [ASIA]) voluntarily participated in this study. Sampling was conducted from hospitals and spinal cord injury rehabilitation centers of Tehran. For intervention, the patient was in the body weight support system. Patients’ weight supported and suspended with harnesses and lifter of the body weight support system to the extent that knees were not bent in stance phase and fingers can’t be dragged into swing phase. Treadmill speed and amount of weight support adjusted depending on the patient’s conditions. Intervention applied for eight weeks and three sessions a week. Each session lasted 30 minutes. Outcome measures were Berg balance scale and SF-36 questioner. The quality of life evaluated before and after the intervention. Berg balance scale was evaluated at baseline and every two weeks throughout the intervention. The results were compared with each assessment. Repeated measure ANOVA test used for analysis of the scores of Berg balance scale and SF-36, paired t-test used.
Results The evaluation results indicated that the scores of Berg balance scale, increased significantly compared to the previous stage in each reevaluation. Between the various stages of evaluation, the maximum difference was between the second and third stages (P=0.008) that were after two and four weeks after the first session respectively. The score of SF-36 showed no significant difference. Between 8 items that measured in SF-36 questioner, just score of »emotional roll functioning « increased significantly (P=0.006).
Conclusion According to achieved results, eight weeks body weight supported treadmill training can improve the balance of the patients with spinal cord injury. It was observed that the gait training with stimulation and use of proprioceptors and increase of patient’s confidence in walking and standing positions improve the patient’s balance. The patients were also able to control the internal and external perturbations and maintain the better balance. But eight weeks gait training had no significant effect on the quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury which suggest that more extended rehabilitation is required.

Keywords: Spinal cord injury, Gait training, Berg balance scale
Full-Text [PDF 2406 kb]   (2408 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (10141 Views)  
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Physical Therapy
Received: 9/06/2017 | Accepted: 23/09/2017 | Published: 22/12/2017
References
1. Rahimi Movaghar V, Sayyah MK, Akbari H, Khorramirouz R, Rasouli MR, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in developing countries: A systematic review. Neuroepidemiology. 2013; 41(2):65–85. doi: 10.1159/000350710 [DOI:10.1159/000350710]
2. Dumont RJ, Okonkwo DO, Verma S, Hurlbert RJ, Boulos PT, Ellegala DB, et al. Acute spinal cord injury, part I: Pathophysiologic mechanisms. Clinical Neuropharmacology. 2001; 24(5):254–64. doi: 10.1097/00002826-200109000-00002 [DOI:10.1097/00002826-200109000-00002]
3. American Spinal Injury Association. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2000. Atlanta, GA: American Spinal Injury Association; 2008.
4. Dobkin BH, Havton LA. Basic advances and new avenues in therapy of spinal cord injury. Annual Review of Medicine. 2004; 55(1):255–82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.104338 [DOI:10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.104338]
5. Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Pohl M. Locomotor training for walking after spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd006676.pub3 [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006676.pub3]
6. Sekhon LHS, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001; 26(Supplement):S2–S12. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00002 [DOI:10.1097/00007632-200112151-00002]
7. Waters R. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1994; 75(3):306–11. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5 [DOI:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5]
8. Thuret S, Moon LDF, Gage FH. Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2006; 7(8):628–43. doi: 10.1038/nrn1955 [DOI:10.1038/nrn1955]
9. Joghataei MT, Mohammad K, Rahgozar M, Siadati S. [Prevalence of some paralysis and limb amputation disabilities in Iran national epidemiological survey (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2002; 3(1):7-16.
10. Ayyoubian M, Abdollahi I, Amiri M. [Study cause of SCI in client user of rehabilitation services (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2005; 5(4):18-23.
11. Jackson AB. Overview of spinal cord injury anatomy & physiology [Internet]. 2000 [Updated 2011 August 9]. Available from: www.spinalcord.uab.edu/show.asp?durkiZ32105
12. Azimian M, Dadkhah A. Measurment of frequency of signs & symptoms in 120 cases with cord injury. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2008; 6(1):68-72.
13. Van der Salm A, Nene AV, Maxwell DJ, Veltink PH, Hermens HJ, IJzerman MJ. Gait impairments in a group of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury and their relevance regarding therapeutic approaches using functional electrical stimulation. Artificial Organs. 2005; 29(1):8–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.29004.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.29004.x]
14. Harvey LA. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2016; 62(1):4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.11.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.jphys.2015.11.004]
15. Bromley I. Tetraplegia and paraplegia: A guide for physiotherapists. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.
16. Behrman AL, Bowden MG, Nair PM. Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: An Emerging Paradigm Shift in Rehabilitation and Walking Recovery. Physical Therapy. 2006; 86(10):1406–25. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050212 [DOI:10.2522/ptj.20050212]
17. Barbeau H, Fung J. The role of rehabilitation in the recovery of walking in the neurological population. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2001; 14(6):735–40. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200112000-00009 [DOI:10.1097/00019052-200112000-00009]
18. Volker D. Neuronal plasticity after spinal cord injury: Significance for present and future treatments. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2006; 29(5):481–8. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753897 [DOI:10.1080/10790268.2006.11753897]
19. DePaul VG, Wishart LR, Richardson J, Lee TD, Thabane L. Varied overground walking-task practice versus body-weight-supported treadmill training in ambulatory adults within one year of stroke: A randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Neurology. 2011; 11(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-129 [DOI:10.1186/1471-2377-11-129]
20. Frigon A, Rossignol S. Experiments and models of sensorimotor interactions during locomotion. Biological Cybernetics. 2006; 95(6):607–27. doi: 10.1007/s00422-006-0129-x [DOI:10.1007/s00422-006-0129-x]
21. Duysens J, Van de Crommert HWA. Neural control of locomotion; Part 1: The central pattern generator from cats to humans. Gait & Posture. 1998; 7(2):131–41. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(97)00042-8 [DOI:10.1016/S0966-6362(97)00042-8]
22. Forssberg H, Grillner S. The locomotion of the acute spinal cat injected with clonidine i.v. Brain Research. 1973; 50(1):184–6. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90606-9 [DOI:10.1016/0006-8993(73)90606-9]
23. Adams MM, Hicks AL. Comparison of the effects of body-weight-supported treadmill training and tilt-table standing on spasticity in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine . 2011; 34(5):488–94. doi: 10.1179/2045772311y.0000000028 [DOI:10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000028]
24. Dietz V. Body weight supported gait training: From laboratory to clinical setting. Brain Research Bulletin. 2009; 78(1):I–VI. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(08)00410-3 [DOI:10.1016/S0361-9230(08)00410-3]
25. Finch L, Barbeau H, Arsenault B. Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: Development of a gait retraining strategy. Physical Therapy. 1991; 71(11):842–55. doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.11.842 [DOI:10.1093/ptj/71.11.842]
26. Marsolais EB, Kobetic RU. Implantation techniques and experience with percutaneous intramuscular electrodes in the lower extremities. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 1986; 23(3):1-8. [PMID]
27. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: A series of case studies. Physical Therapy. 2000; 80(7):688-700. PMID: 10869131 [PMID]
28. Morawietz C, Moffat F. Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2013; 94(11):2297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.023 [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.023]
29. Wessels M, Lucas C, Eriks I, de Groot S. Body weight-supported gait training for restoration of walking in people with an incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2010; 42(6):513–9. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0525 [DOI:10.2340/16501977-0525]
30. Alexeeva N, Sames C, Jacobs PL, Hobday L, DiStasio MM, Mitchell SA, et al. Comparison of training methods to improve walking in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2011; 34(4):362–79. doi: 10.1179/2045772311y.0000000018 [DOI:10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000018]
31. Sharif H, Gammage K, Chun S, Ditor D. Effects of FES-Ambulation Training on locomotor function and health-related quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2014; 20(1):58–69. doi: 10.1310/sci2001-58 [DOI:10.1310/sci2001-58]
32. Salavati M, Negahban H, Mazaheri M, Soleimanifar M, Hadadi M, Sefiddashti L, et al. The Persian version of the Berg Balance Scale: Inter and intra-rater reliability and construct validity in elderly adults. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2012; 34(20):1695–8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.660604 [DOI:10.3109/09638288.2012.660604]
33. Fritz SL, Merlo Rains AM, Rivers ED, Peters DM, Goodman A, Watson ET, et al. An intensive intervention for improving gait, balance, and mobility in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A pilot study of activity tolerance and benefits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2011; 92(11):1776–84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.006 [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.006]
34. Forrest GF, Lorenz DJ, Hutchinson K, VanHiel LR, Basso DM, Datta S, et al. Ambulation and balance outcomes measure different aspects of recovery in individuals with chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012; 93(9):1553–64. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.051 [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.051]
35. Harkema SJ, Schmidt-Read M, Lorenz DJ, Edgerton VR, Behrman AL. Balance and ambulation improvements in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury using Locomotor Training–Based rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012; 93(9):1508–17. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.024 [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.024]
36. Raeisi Dehkordi M, Sadeghi H, Bani Talebi E. [The comparison of traditional exercises & Body Weight Supported Training (BWST) exercises on sensory-motor function, quality and quantity of walking in paraplegic spinal cord injured persons (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2015; 15(4):22-31.
37. Stevens SL, Caputo JL, Fuller DK, Morgan DW. Effects of underwater treadmill training on leg strength, balance, and walking performance in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2014; 38(1):91–101. doi: 10.1179/2045772314y.0000000217 [DOI:10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000217]
38. Foster H, DeMark L, Spigel PM, Rose DK, Fox EJ. The effects of backward walking training on balance and mobility in an individual with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A case report. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2016; 32(7):536–45. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1206155 [DOI:10.1080/09593985.2016.1206155]
39. Sadrossadat SJ, Sadrossadat L. The role of self-esteem on vocational rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2007; 5(1):56-9.
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.